EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-08/000017_owner-lightwav…bcom.webcom.com_Sat Aug 5 16:21:14 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-09-02 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA023694874; Sat, 5 Aug 1995 16:21:14 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail.globalone.net by webcom.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA023334857; Sat, 5 Aug 1995 16:20:57 -0700
Received: from shell.globalone.net ([e-mail] [198.69.121.31]) by mail.globalone.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA13257 for <[e-mail]>; Sat, 5 Aug 1995 12:26:31 -0400
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 1995 12:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: [e-mail]
X-Sender: [e-mail]
To: LightWave Mailing List <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 3.1 vs 3.5
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Chris J Clements wrote:

> Can anyone tell me if images rendered from Lightwave3.1 are identical to
> images from 3.5.

Identical, yes....exactly the same, no.  If you have an animation with
100 sequential frames rendered under 3.5 followed by 100 sequential frames
that were rendered with 3.1, you shouldn't be able to notice where one
sequence ends and the next begins....but, if you render all the odd
number frames with 3.5 and all the even number frames with 3.1, you will
most likely have some sort of noticeable flicker when the animation is
played back.

Don't forget that there are some 3.5 features that will not render under
3.1...it's been so long since I've used 3.1 though, I can't remember any
of them.

                                     -David Warner
                                      Event Horizon Graphics


--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]